WFRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of 31.6%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 2.51%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.55%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, which suggesting that the stock is 76.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.133%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $171.3K. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is higher than CKX Lands's net income of $54.1K. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.15x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 55.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.98x versus 12.42x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of -38.8%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat Empire Petroleum's return on equity of -56.67%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.55%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Empire Petroleum.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, which suggesting that the stock is 76.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.489%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Empire Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Empire Petroleum quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is higher than Empire Petroleum's net income of -$4M. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.15x while Empire Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.98x versus 4.54x for Empire Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of 10.02%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.55%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.13 which suggests that it could grow by 33.89%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Halliburton.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, which suggesting that the stock is 76.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.19%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.15x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.98x versus 1.07x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 11.14% compared to Weatherford International PLC's net margin of 12.95%. Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73%.

Weatherford International PLC has a consensus price target of $111.00, signalling upside risk potential of 53.55%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $55.61 which suggests that it could grow by 44.83%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, which suggesting that the stock is 76.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.415%.

Weatherford International PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Weatherford International PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Weatherford International PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.15x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 12.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Weatherford International PLC is 0.98x versus 1.54x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.