WDFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 12.8% compared to WD-40's net margin of -0.63%. WD-40's return on equity of 32.43% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WD-40 has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe WD-40 is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.935% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $155M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. WD-40's net income of $19.8M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.62x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innospec has a net margin of 12.8% compared to WD-40's net margin of 7.53%. WD-40's return on equity of 32.43% beat Innospec's return on equity of 12.17%.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Innospec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.38%. Given that WD-40 has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe WD-40 is more attractive than Innospec.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.935% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.649%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Innospec offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec pays out 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $155M, which are smaller than Innospec quarterly revenues of $443.4M. WD-40's net income of $19.8M is lower than Innospec's net income of $33.4M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while Innospec's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.62x versus 1.48x for Innospec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 12.8% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 32.43% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 264.74%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.935% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $155M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $19.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.62x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 12.8% compared to WD-40's net margin of --. WD-40's return on equity of 32.43% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

WD-40 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.12%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 150.42%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than WD-40, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than WD-40.

WD-40 has a beta of -0.069, which suggesting that the stock is 106.935% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

WD-40 has a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WD-40 pays 67.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WD-40's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WD-40 quarterly revenues are $155M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. WD-40's net income of $19.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, WD-40's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.84x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WD-40 is 5.62x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.