IOSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of 7.16%. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $126.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.16%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.72%. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Innospec has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.662%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.21x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 5.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.22x versus 0.73x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of -1.23%. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $126.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.16%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innospec has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Innospec is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Innospec has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.042%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Innospec's is not.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.21x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.22x versus 0.27x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of --. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $126.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.16%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 188.72%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.21x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.22x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -15.08% compared to Innospec's net margin of --. Innospec's return on equity of 2.97% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Innospec has a consensus price target of $126.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.16%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.34%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Innospec, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Innospec.

Innospec has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

Innospec has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innospec pays 108.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innospec quarterly revenues are $466.8M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Innospec's net income of -$70.4M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Innospec's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.21x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innospec is 1.22x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.