Financhill
Sell
28

SWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.62
Seasonality move :
-78.48%
Day range:
$1.65 - $1.86
52-week range:
$1.16 - $43.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
9.42x
P/B ratio:
4.59x
Volume:
111.7K
Avg. volume:
78.7K
1-year change:
-87.22%
Market cap:
$27.6M
Revenue:
$4.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.33

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
-- -- -- -- $4.00
FUTU
Futu Holdings
$587.3M $1.71 35.27% 67.95% $140.33
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
-- -- -- -- --
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
-- -- -- -- --
TOP
TOP Financial Group
-- -- -- -- --
TROO
TROOPS
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
$1.67 $4.00 $27.6M -- $0.00 0% 9.42x
FUTU
Futu Holdings
$101.17 $140.33 $14.1B 20.29x $2.00 0% 8.13x
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
$1.92 -- $73.7M 11.24x $0.00 0% 2.32x
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
$1.26 -- $5.1M -- $0.01 0% 3.88x
TOP
TOP Financial Group
$1.12 -- $41.5M 61.61x $0.00 0% 13.65x
TROO
TROOPS
$0.56 -- $62.7M -- $0.00 0% 5.65x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
-- -2.933 -- 1.04x
FUTU
Futu Holdings
22.81% 1.152 9.66% 0.67x
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
22.88% -2.488 9.26% 0.30x
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
-- 1.248 -- 56.19x
TOP
TOP Financial Group
-- 0.507 -- 3.64x
TROO
TROOPS
18.45% 4.940 6.4% 2.30x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
-- -- -58.97% -58.97% -- --
FUTU
Futu Holdings
$470.3M $285.2M 16.9% 20.37% 50.03% --
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
-- -- -27.01% -30.78% -- --
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
-- -- -0.43% -0.43% -- --
TOP
TOP Financial Group
-- -- 2.73% 2.73% -- --
TROO
TROOPS
-- -- -3.12% -3.38% -- --

Solowin Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SWIN or FUTU?

    Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of 42.23%. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    -- -- $8.9M
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings
    82.49% $1.72 $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About SWIN or FUTU?

    Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.95%. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $140.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.7%. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Futu Holdings, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Futu Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    0 0 0
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings
    10 2 0
  • Is SWIN or FUTU More Risky?

    Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.772%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or FUTU?

    Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or FUTU?

    Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 9.42x versus 8.13x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    9.42x -- -- --
    FUTU
    Futu Holdings
    8.13x 20.29x $570.1M $240.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MATH?

    Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    -- -- $8.9M
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding
    -- -- $21.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MATH?

    Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.95%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    0 0 0
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is SWIN or MATH More Risky?

    Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.417%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MATH?

    Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MATH?

    Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 9.42x versus 2.32x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    9.42x -- -- --
    MATH
    Metalpha Technology Holding
    2.32x 11.24x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MEGL?

    Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    -- -- $8.9M
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global
    -- -- $17.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MEGL?

    Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.95%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    0 0 0
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global
    0 0 0
  • Is SWIN or MEGL More Risky?

    Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MEGL?

    Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MEGL?

    Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 9.42x versus 3.88x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    9.42x -- -- --
    MEGL
    Magic Empire Global
    3.88x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SWIN or TOP?

    TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    -- -- $8.9M
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group
    -- -- $40.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About SWIN or TOP?

    Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.95%. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    0 0 0
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group
    0 0 0
  • Is SWIN or TOP More Risky?

    Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or TOP?

    Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or TOP?

    Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 9.42x versus 13.65x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    9.42x -- -- --
    TOP
    TOP Financial Group
    13.65x 61.61x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SWIN or TROO?

    TROOPS has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    -- -- $8.9M
    TROO
    TROOPS
    -- -- $72.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About SWIN or TROO?

    Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 138.95%. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than TROOPS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    0 0 0
    TROO
    TROOPS
    0 0 0
  • Is SWIN or TROO More Risky?

    Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.036%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or TROO?

    Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or TROO?

    Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 9.42x versus 5.65x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SWIN
    Solowin Holdings
    9.42x -- -- --
    TROO
    TROOPS
    5.65x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Berkshire The Best Stock to Buy in a Bad Market?
Is Berkshire The Best Stock to Buy in a Bad Market?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A, BRK.B) has historically been one of the…

Is Shopify Stock Still a Buy in 2025 or Has Growth Peaked?
Is Shopify Stock Still a Buy in 2025 or Has Growth Peaked?

The big picture trends in e‑commerce sales are clearly in…

Is RTX The Best Growth Stock?
Is RTX The Best Growth Stock?

Among the worldwide aerospace and defense markets, the US controls…

Stock Ideas

Buy
71
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 6

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 41.47% over the past day.

Buy
63
SKX alert for May 6

Skechers USA [SKX] is down 0.03% over the past day.

Sell
20
PTCT alert for May 6

PTC Therapeutics [PTCT] is down 2.12% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock