Where Will Cognizant Stock Be In 5 Years?
Cognizant Technologies (NASDAQ:CTSH) is a global provider of IT services…
Sell
14
SWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.35
Seasonality move
:
-91.51%
Day range:
$1.59 - $1.78
52-week range:
$1.16 - $43.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
8.97x
P/B ratio:
4.37x
Volume:
316.4K
Avg. volume:
77.7K
1-year change:
-95.96%
Market cap:
$26.3M
Revenue:
$4.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $4.00 |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$592.9M | $1.94 | 35.27% | 67.95% | $138.40 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
$1.59 | $4.00 | $26.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.97x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$111.44 | $138.40 | $15.5B | 22.35x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.95x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$2.80 | -- | $107.4M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.38x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.36 | -- | $5.5M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.20x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.28 | -- | $47.4M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.60x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
$0.69 | -- | $77.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.98x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -2.933 | -- | 1.04x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
22.81% | 1.152 | 9.66% | 0.67x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | -2.488 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 1.248 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.507 | -- | 3.64x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
18.45% | 4.940 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -58.97% | -58.97% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$470.3M | $285.2M | 16.9% | 20.37% | 50.03% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Solowin Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of 42.23%. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M FUTUFutu Holdings82.49% $1.72 $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 150.94%. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $138.40 which suggests that it could grow by 24.19%. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Futu Holdings, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Futu Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is SWIN or FUTU More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.772%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.97x versus 8.95x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.97x -- -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings8.95x 22.35x $570.1M $240.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 150.94%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or MATH More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.97x versus 3.38x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.97x -- -- -- MATHMetalpha Technology Holding3.38x 11.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 150.94%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or MEGL More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.97x versus 4.20x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.97x -- -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global4.20x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 150.94%. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or TOP More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.97x versus 15.60x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.97x -- -- -- TOPTOP Financial Group15.60x 61.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or TROO?
TROOPS has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M TROOTROOPS-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or TROO?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 150.94%. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than TROOPS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 TROOTROOPS0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or TROO More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.036%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or TROO?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or TROO?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 8.97x versus 6.98x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings8.97x -- -- -- TROOTROOPS6.98x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are two of the hottest…
Why Did Forge Global Stock Go Down?
Shares of Forge Global (NYSE:FRGE), a platform that allows accredited…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
66
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
54
AAP alert for May 23
Advance Auto Parts [AAP] is down 0.98% over the past day.
Buy
67
IONQ alert for May 23
IonQ [IONQ] is down 0.48% over the past day.
Buy
75
URBN alert for May 23
Urban Outfitters [URBN] is down 1.24% over the past day.
