How High Will Eli Lilly Stock Go By 2030?
The weight loss drugs market is heating up quickly and…
Sell
38
MATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.66
Seasonality move
:
-1.7%
Day range:
$1.62 - $1.72
52-week range:
$0.80 - $2.78
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
11.24x
P/S ratio:
1.97x
P/B ratio:
2.47x
Volume:
38.5K
Avg. volume:
51.2K
1-year change:
10.07%
Market cap:
$62.5M
Revenue:
$16.8M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$587.3M | $1.71 | 35.27% | 67.95% | $140.30 |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $4.00 |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$1.63 | -- | $62.5M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.97x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
$2.25 | -- | $5.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.45x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$85.34 | $140.30 | $11.9B | 17.12x | $2.00 | 0% | 6.86x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.13 | -- | $4.6M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 3.49x |
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
$1.67 | $4.00 | $27.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 9.40x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.13 | -- | $41.8M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 13.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | -1.843 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | 0.786 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
22.81% | 0.350 | 9.66% | 0.67x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | 56.19x |
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -7.038 | -- | 1.04x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.375 | -- | 3.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group
|
-- | -- | -63.52% | -63.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$470.3M | $285.2M | 16.9% | 20.37% | 50.03% | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -58.97% | -58.97% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
Metalpha Technology Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or ABTS?
Abits Group has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M ABTSAbits Group-- -- $11.3M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or ABTS?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abits Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Abits Group, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than Abits Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 ABTSAbits Group0 0 0 -
Is MATH or ABTS More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 217.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group has a beta of 2.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.714%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or ABTS?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abits Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or ABTS?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Abits Group quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Abits Group's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Abits Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 1.97x versus 1.45x for Abits Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding1.97x 11.24x -- -- ABTSAbits Group1.45x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of 42.23%. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M FUTUFutu Holdings82.49% $1.72 $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or FUTU?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $140.30 which suggests that it could grow by 64.4%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is MATH or FUTU More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 217.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.677%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or FUTU?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or FUTU?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 1.97x versus 6.86x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding1.97x 11.24x -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings6.86x 17.12x $570.1M $240.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or MEGL?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is MATH or MEGL More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 217.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or MEGL?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or MEGL?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 1.97x versus 3.49x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding1.97x 11.24x -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global3.49x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or SWIN?
Solowin Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or SWIN?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solowin Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 139.52%. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 -
Is MATH or SWIN More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 217.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or SWIN?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solowin Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solowin Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or SWIN?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than Solowin Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Solowin Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 1.97x versus 9.40x for Solowin Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding1.97x 11.24x -- -- SWINSolowin Holdings9.40x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MATH or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Metalpha Technology Holding's net margin of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MATH or TOP?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Metalpha Technology Holding has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Metalpha Technology Holding is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is MATH or TOP More Risky?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 217.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MATH or TOP?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Metalpha Technology Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MATH or TOP?
Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Metalpha Technology Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metalpha Technology Holding is 1.97x versus 13.77x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MATHMetalpha Technology Holding1.97x 11.24x -- -- TOPTOP Financial Group13.77x 61.61x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is TSMC the Best Semiconductor Stock to Buy Now?
The new administration has launched a slew of tariffs, paused…
Rocket Lab Vs Intuitive Machines Stock
The commercialization of outer space is now in full swing,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
42
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.4T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
72
EFX alert for Apr 23
Equifax [EFX] is up 13.86% over the past day.
Buy
51
CALX alert for Apr 23
Calix [CALX] is up 13.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
NOC alert for Apr 23
Northrop Grumman [NOC] is down 12.3% over the past day.
