PLBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comerica has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 22.69%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Comerica's return on equity of 9.06%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.8%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $71.49 which suggests that it could grow by 15.74%. Given that Comerica has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Comerica is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.583%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Comerica offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $811M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Comerica's net income of $184M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.84x while Comerica's PE ratio is 15.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.58x versus 2.58x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Central Pacific Financial has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 20.37%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.8%. On the other hand Central Pacific Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.19%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.679%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Central Pacific Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial pays out 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues of $65.3M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.84x while Central Pacific Financial's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.58x versus 3.14x for Central Pacific Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 16.32%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.8%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.84x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.58x versus 2.88x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Hawaiian has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 30.55%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat First Hawaiian's return on equity of 8.97%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.8%. On the other hand First Hawaiian has an analysts' consensus of $26.38 which suggests that it could grow by 1.64%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Hawaiian, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than First Hawaiian.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Hawaiian has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.692%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. First Hawaiian offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. First Hawaiian pays out 56.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than First Hawaiian quarterly revenues of $201.3M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than First Hawaiian's net income of $61.5M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.84x while First Hawaiian's PE ratio is 14.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.58x versus 4.17x for First Hawaiian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.