MRCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BWX Technologies has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 11.06%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat BWX Technologies's return on equity of 27.87%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.81%. On the other hand BWX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $136.96 which suggests that it could grow by 11.94%. Given that BWX Technologies has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe BWX Technologies is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BWX Technologies has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.075%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BWX Technologies offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BWX Technologies pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. BWX Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are smaller than BWX Technologies quarterly revenues of $682.3M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is lower than BWX Technologies's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BWX Technologies's PE ratio is 38.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.24x versus 4.04x for BWX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CAM Group has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of --. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.81%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercury Systems has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Mercury Systems is more attractive than CAM Group.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -0.359, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.871%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.24x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 1.49%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.81%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $37.09 which suggests that it could fall by -2.7%. Given that Mercury Systems has more downside risk than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.016%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 293.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.24x versus 5.12x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 7.36%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat Park Aerospace's return on equity of 5.35%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $46.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.81%. On the other hand Park Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 84.92%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, which suggesting that the stock is 30.455% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.357, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.293%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Aerospace offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are larger than Park Aerospace quarterly revenues of $16.9M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Park Aerospace's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Aerospace's PE ratio is 48.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.24x versus 4.58x for Park Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.