PKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CAM Group has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of --. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.58%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than CAM Group.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.357, which suggesting that the stock is 64.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -0.359, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.871%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.62x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of 1.49%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.58%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $37.09 which suggests that it could grow by 5.34%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.357, which suggesting that the stock is 64.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.016%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 270.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.62x versus 4.73x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of -9.07%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.58%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $46.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.24%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.357, which suggesting that the stock is 64.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.455%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $211.4M. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.62x versus 3.04x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 10.95% compared to Park Aerospace's net margin of -658%. Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

Park Aerospace has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 85.58%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.357, which suggesting that the stock is 64.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.938%.

Park Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 8.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Park Aerospace pays 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Park Aerospace quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Park Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park Aerospace is 4.62x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.