MPWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 30.77%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 20.38% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.5%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $234.42 which suggests that it could grow by 6.17%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Broadcom.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.725%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 43.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $620.1M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $144.4M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.88x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 180.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.23x versus 20.29x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of -125.26%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 20.38% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.5%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 24.63%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than Intel.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Intel offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 43.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $620.1M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $144.4M is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.88x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.23x versus 1.54x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 21.47%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 20.38% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.5%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.64 which suggests that it could grow by 47.19%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 43.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $620.1M, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $144.4M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.88x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.23x versus 3.50x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Monolithic Power Systems's net margin of 55.04%. Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 20.38% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.5%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that Monolithic Power Systems has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Monolithic Power Systems is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Monolithic Power Systems has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Monolithic Power Systems pays 43.49% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues are $620.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $144.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Monolithic Power Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.88x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monolithic Power Systems is 14.23x versus 29.57x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.