MKTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Interactive Brokers Group has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 9.22%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.13%. On the other hand Interactive Brokers Group has an analysts' consensus of $195.40 which suggests that it could grow by 7.63%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.012%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Interactive Brokers Group offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group pays out 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues of $2.3B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Interactive Brokers Group's PE ratio is 25.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.40x versus 2.11x for Interactive Brokers Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 26.13%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.13%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.86 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that Morgan Stanley has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Morgan Stanley is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.001%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 14.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.40x versus 3.22x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 34.1%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.13%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.21%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.659%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.40x versus 7.44x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virtu Financial has a net margin of 32.18% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 11.9%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42% beat Virtu Financial's return on equity of 21.87%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $232.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.13%. On the other hand Virtu Financial has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.23%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Virtu Financial, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Virtu Financial.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virtu Financial has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.463%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Virtu Financial offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Virtu Financial pays out 108.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Virtu Financial's is not.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $202.4M, which are smaller than Virtu Financial quarterly revenues of $837.9M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M is lower than Virtu Financial's net income of $99.7M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.04x while Virtu Financial's PE ratio is 11.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.40x versus 1.17x for Virtu Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.