IBKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 56.84%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $201.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.6%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $292.77 which suggests that it could grow by 66.82%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.00x versus 7.21x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 90.34%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 19.66%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $201.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.6%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $58.82 which suggests that it could grow by 34.66%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $1B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $916M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 27.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.00x versus 13.58x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 26.13%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.08%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $201.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.6%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $129.83 which suggests that it could grow by 20.08%. Given that Morgan Stanley has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Morgan Stanley is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.296, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.648%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 12.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.00x versus 2.90x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 34.53%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.93% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $201.50, signalling upside risk potential of 17.6%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $86.45 which suggests that it could grow by 12.33%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.098%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $217M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.76x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 25.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.00x versus 7.20x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.