CVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of 1.78% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -2.72%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 412.82%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 173.97%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.787%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. CVD Equipment's net income of $132K is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 27.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.79x versus 0.22x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of 1.78% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -289.48%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53% beat Intevac's return on equity of -37.3%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 412.82%. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.22%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Intevac.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.04%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than Intevac quarterly revenues of $11.3M. CVD Equipment's net income of $132K is higher than Intevac's net income of -$32.8M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.79x versus 1.67x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 1.78% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -814.55%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 412.82%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. CVD Equipment's net income of $132K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.79x versus 7.41x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 1.78% compared to CVD Equipment's net margin of -11.09%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

CVD Equipment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 412.82%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 347.65%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than SIFCO Industries, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than SIFCO Industries.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.084%.

CVD Equipment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CVD Equipment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CVD Equipment quarterly revenues are $7.4M, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. CVD Equipment's net income of $132K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, CVD Equipment's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CVD Equipment is 0.79x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.