BWEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nuburu has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -25746.56%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat Nuburu's return on equity of --.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 156.41%. On the other hand Nuburu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Nuburu, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Nuburu.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuburu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuburu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than Nuburu quarterly revenues of $49.3K. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is higher than Nuburu's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.24x while Nuburu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.24x versus 0.45x for Nuburu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of 1.78%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 156.41%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 422.88%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.061, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.119%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.24x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.24x versus 0.78x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -814.55%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 156.41%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.24x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.24x versus 6.42x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -11.09%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 156.41%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 341.25%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.113% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.084%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.24x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.24x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.