IVAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -7.62% compared to Intevac's net margin of 0.21%. Intevac's return on equity of -7.77% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 163.34%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Intevac.

Intevac has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.202% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.678%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Intevac's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.34x versus 0.25x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -7.62% compared to Intevac's net margin of 2.48%. Intevac's return on equity of -7.77% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 295.06%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Intevac.

Intevac has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.202% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.025%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Intevac's net income of -$2.2M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $203K. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.34x versus 1.17x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -7.62% compared to Intevac's net margin of -161.83%. Intevac's return on equity of -7.77% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intevac has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Intevac is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Intevac has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.202% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Intevac's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.34x versus 3.58x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -7.62% compared to Intevac's net margin of 0.25%. Intevac's return on equity of -7.77% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

Intevac has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 112.77%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 311.83%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Intevac.

Intevac has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.202% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

Intevac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intevac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intevac quarterly revenues are $28.5M, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Intevac's net income of -$2.2M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, Intevac's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intevac is 1.34x versus 0.18x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.