APPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Okta has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 3.37%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.35%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $120.83 which suggests that it could fall by -3.75%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Okta.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.114%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Okta's PE ratio is 3,138.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.71x versus 8.46x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 17.96%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.35%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $101.12 which suggests that it could fall by -2.11%. Given that Appian has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Appian is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.811%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 50.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.71x versus 5.85x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of 1%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.35%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of $32.71 which suggests that it could grow by 40.04%. Given that Rapid7 has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Rapid7 is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.791%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $210.3M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Rapid7's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rapid7's PE ratio is 59.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.71x versus 1.90x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Appian's net margin of -33.19%. Appian's return on equity of -2892.71% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Appian has a consensus price target of $34.83, signalling upside risk potential of 8.35%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $203.36 which suggests that it could grow by 11.2%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Appian, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Appian.

Appian has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.429% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Appian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Appian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Appian quarterly revenues are $166.4M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Appian's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Appian's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Appian is 3.71x versus 16.78x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.