VRSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BigBear.ai Holdings has a net margin of 49.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of -178.34%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat BigBear.ai Holdings's return on equity of -230.66%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $253.84, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand BigBear.ai Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.83 which suggests that it could grow by 32.78%. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BigBear.ai Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. BigBear.ai Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BigBear.ai Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $402.3M, which are larger than BigBear.ai Holdings quarterly revenues of $34.8M. VeriSign's net income of $199.3M is higher than BigBear.ai Holdings's net income of -$62M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.20x while BigBear.ai Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 17.16x versus 5.69x for BigBear.ai Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 49.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of -10.03%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Castellum's return on equity of -42.29%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $253.84, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 191.26%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 498.483%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $402.3M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.7M. VeriSign's net income of $199.3M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.20x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 17.16x versus 1.44x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 49.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of -35.76%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 20.97%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $253.84, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $62.60 which suggests that it could grow by 78.86%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than VeriSign, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than VeriSign.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $402.3M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $36M. VeriSign's net income of $199.3M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.20x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 27.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 17.16x versus 8.36x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 49.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 24.22%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.3%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $253.84, signalling downside risk potential of -9.27%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $96.61 which suggests that it could fall by -21.65%. Given that Palantir Technologies has more downside risk than VeriSign, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.799, which suggesting that the stock is 20.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.28%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $402.3M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $883.9M. VeriSign's net income of $199.3M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $214M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.20x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 536.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 17.16x versus 98.53x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.