BBAI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -334.24% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings's net margin of -26.62%. BigBear.ai Holdings's return on equity of -535.49% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.38, signalling upside risk potential of 55.69%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.27%. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings is more attractive than Castellum.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings quarterly revenues are $43.8M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. BigBear.ai Holdings's net income of -$146.5M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings is 4.15x versus 1.20x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -334.24% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings's net margin of 4.19%. BigBear.ai Holdings's return on equity of -535.49% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.38, signalling upside risk potential of 55.69%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.77%. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings quarterly revenues are $43.8M, which are smaller than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. BigBear.ai Holdings's net income of -$146.5M is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 12.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings is 4.15x versus 11.42x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -334.24% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings's net margin of 9.55%. BigBear.ai Holdings's return on equity of -535.49% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.38, signalling upside risk potential of 55.69%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.77 which suggests that it could fall by -2.01%. Given that BigBear.ai Holdings has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe BigBear.ai Holdings is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings quarterly revenues are $43.8M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. BigBear.ai Holdings's net income of -$146.5M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 466.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings is 4.15x versus 75.73x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoundHound AI has a net margin of -334.24% compared to BigBear.ai Holdings's net margin of -748.63%. BigBear.ai Holdings's return on equity of -535.49% beat SoundHound AI's return on equity of -197.85%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.38, signalling upside risk potential of 55.69%. On the other hand SoundHound AI has an analysts' consensus of $14.36 which suggests that it could grow by 73.4%. Given that SoundHound AI has higher upside potential than BigBear.ai Holdings, analysts believe SoundHound AI is more attractive than BigBear.ai Holdings.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoundHound AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BigBear.ai Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoundHound AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BigBear.ai Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoundHound AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BigBear.ai Holdings quarterly revenues are $43.8M, which are larger than SoundHound AI quarterly revenues of $34.5M. BigBear.ai Holdings's net income of -$146.5M is higher than SoundHound AI's net income of -$258.6M. Notably, BigBear.ai Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoundHound AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BigBear.ai Holdings is 4.15x versus 33.10x for SoundHound AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.