ROK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nuburu has a net margin of 9.78% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -25746.56%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.25% beat Nuburu's return on equity of --.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $278.97, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Nuburu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rockwell Automation has higher upside potential than Nuburu, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than Nuburu.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Nuburu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Nuburu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Nuburu quarterly revenues of $49.3K. Rockwell Automation's net income of $184M is higher than Nuburu's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Nuburu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.51x versus 0.44x for Nuburu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadwind has a net margin of 9.78% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -2.72%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.25% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $278.97, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 161.44%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $184M is higher than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Broadwind's PE ratio is 28.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.51x versus 0.24x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 9.78% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -814.55%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.25% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $278.97, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rockwell Automation has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Rockwell Automation is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Rockwell Automation's net income of $184M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.51x versus 6.93x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 9.78% compared to Rockwell Automation's net margin of -11.09%. Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.25% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $278.97, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 350.91%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.413% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

Rockwell Automation has a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rockwell Automation pays 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Rockwell Automation's net income of $184M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Rockwell Automation's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.03x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rockwell Automation is 3.51x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.