MAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eos Energy Enterprises has a net margin of 8.42% compared to Masco's net margin of -40148.24%. Masco's return on equity of 543.85% beat Eos Energy Enterprises's return on equity of --.

Masco has a consensus price target of $85.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.2%. On the other hand Eos Energy Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $4.57 which suggests that it could fall by -11.75%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Eos Energy Enterprises, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Eos Energy Enterprises.

Masco has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Eos Energy Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Masco pays 28.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Eos Energy Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Eos Energy Enterprises quarterly revenues of $854K. Masco's net income of $167M is higher than Eos Energy Enterprises's net income of -$342.9M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.28x while Eos Energy Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 2.03x versus 68.77x for Eos Energy Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of 8.42% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.08%. Masco's return on equity of 543.85% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.45%.

Masco has a consensus price target of $85.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.2%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,075.93 which suggests that it could grow by 0.66%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

Masco has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.038%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share. Masco pays 28.3% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Masco's net income of $167M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $486M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.28x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 2.03x versus 3.11x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 8.42% compared to Masco's net margin of --. Masco's return on equity of 543.85% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Masco has a consensus price target of $85.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.2%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Masco has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Masco pays 28.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Masco's net income of $167M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.28x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 2.03x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 8.42% compared to Masco's net margin of 3.72%. Masco's return on equity of 543.85% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.01%.

Masco has a consensus price target of $85.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.2%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $222.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.17%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Masco, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Masco.

Masco has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.435% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 2.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.509%.

Masco has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Masco pays 28.3% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Masco quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Masco's net income of $167M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $204.3M. Notably, Masco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.28x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 14.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Masco is 2.03x versus 0.43x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.