HAYW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 11.08%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 7.15% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.45%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,075.93 which suggests that it could grow by 0.66%. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.038%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.6M, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $16.5M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $486M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.52x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 3.20x versus 3.11x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 8.42%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 7.15% beat Masco's return on equity of 543.85%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $85.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.2%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.435%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 28.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.6M, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $2B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $16.5M is lower than Masco's net income of $167M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.52x while Masco's PE ratio is 19.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 3.20x versus 2.03x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of --. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 7.15% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hayward Holdings has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe Hayward Holdings is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.6M, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. Hayward Holdings's net income of $16.5M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.52x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 3.20x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Hayward Holdings's net margin of 3.72%. Hayward Holdings's return on equity of 7.15% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.01%.

Hayward Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.07, signalling upside risk potential of 17.73%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $222.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.17%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Hayward Holdings.

Hayward Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 2.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.509%.

Hayward Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Hayward Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.6M, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Hayward Holdings's net income of $16.5M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $204.3M. Notably, Hayward Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.52x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 14.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings is 3.20x versus 0.43x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.