LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of -11.55%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $37.45, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $59.88 which suggests that it could fall by -1.83%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.89x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 7.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.32x versus 0.55x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 17.2%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Globe Life's return on equity of 20.89%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $37.45, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand Globe Life has an analysts' consensus of $140.45 which suggests that it could grow by 15.06%. Given that Globe Life has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Globe Life is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.31%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Globe Life offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life pays out 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Globe Life quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Globe Life's net income of $254.6M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.89x while Globe Life's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.32x versus 1.82x for Globe Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 5.17%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.75%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $37.45, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $90.86 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.655%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than MetLife's net income of $945M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.89x while MetLife's PE ratio is 13.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.32x versus 0.78x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of -15.3% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 21%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 16.26% beat Primerica's return on equity of 23.29%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $37.45, signalling upside risk potential of 8.82%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $297.43 which suggests that it could grow by 6.62%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Primerica, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Primerica.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.054% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.621%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Lincoln National pays 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $804.8M. Lincoln National's net income of -$722M is lower than Primerica's net income of $169.1M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.89x while Primerica's PE ratio is 18.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.32x versus 2.97x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.