IR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coda Octopus Group has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 17.53%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Coda Octopus Group's return on equity of 7.55%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $93.29, signalling upside risk potential of 29.13%. On the other hand Coda Octopus Group has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.93%. Given that Coda Octopus Group has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, analysts believe Coda Octopus Group is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coda Octopus Group has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.272%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Coda Octopus Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Coda Octopus Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Coda Octopus Group quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is higher than Coda Octopus Group's net income of $913K. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.07x while Coda Octopus Group's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.07x versus 3.28x for Coda Octopus Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 14.7%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $93.29, signalling upside risk potential of 29.13%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $582.48 which suggests that it could grow by 4.21%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Lennox International.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.332%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is higher than Lennox International's net income of $197.7M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.07x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 24.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.07x versus 3.75x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 12.4%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 35.67%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $93.29, signalling upside risk potential of 29.13%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of $381.32 which suggests that it could grow by 14.64%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Trane Technologies PLC, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Trane Technologies PLC.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.893%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $604.3M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.07x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 29.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.07x versus 3.83x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 12.51%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $93.29, signalling upside risk potential of 29.13%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $218.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.09%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.403, which suggesting that the stock is 40.251% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.24%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $540.4M. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is higher than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.07x while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 23.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.07x versus 3.04x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.