FMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of 7.16%. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

FMC has a consensus price target of $47.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.8%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 42.45%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than FMC, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than FMC.

FMC has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.71x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.09x versus 0.71x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of --. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

FMC has a consensus price target of $47.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.8%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 203.03%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than FMC, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than FMC.

FMC has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.71x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.09x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of 4.97%. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

FMC has a consensus price target of $47.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.8%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.11 which suggests that it could grow by 9.76%. Given that FMC has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe FMC is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

FMC has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.71x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.09x versus 1.19x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -1.96% compared to FMC's net margin of --. FMC's return on equity of 7.31% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

FMC has a consensus price target of $47.69, signalling upside risk potential of 32.8%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 140.77%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than FMC, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than FMC.

FMC has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.017% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

FMC has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FMC pays 85.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FMC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FMC quarterly revenues are $791.4M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. FMC's net income of -$15.5M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, FMC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.71x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FMC is 1.09x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.