CAG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 12.92%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $61.64 which suggests that it could grow by 15.48%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than General Mills.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.047, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.326%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.94x while General Mills's PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.92x versus 1.53x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 9.6%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $66.01 which suggests that it could grow by 30.55%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Conagra Brands, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Conagra Brands.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.466, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.446%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is lower than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.94x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 19.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.92x versus 1.14x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of 10.24%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.86%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than PepsiCo.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.94x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.92x versus 1.95x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 5.11% compared to Conagra Brands's net margin of -30.3%. Conagra Brands's return on equity of 3.74% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

Conagra Brands has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 19.88%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $121.19 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than JM Smucker.

Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.179, which suggesting that the stock is 82.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.159%.

Conagra Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.25%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. Conagra Brands pays 189.89% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Conagra Brands's is not.

Conagra Brands quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Conagra Brands's net income of $145.1M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, Conagra Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.94x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conagra Brands is 0.92x versus 1.70x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.