LW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 12.92%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.86, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.11%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.046%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.66x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 32.41%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.86, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.59 which suggests that it could grow by 11.1%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.572%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.38x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lancaster Colony has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of 9.62%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat Lancaster Colony's return on equity of 16.79%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.86, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Lancaster Colony has an analysts' consensus of $205.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.67%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Lancaster Colony, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Lancaster Colony.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.04%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Lancaster Colony offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lancaster Colony pays out 61.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Lancaster Colony quarterly revenues of $509.3M. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Lancaster Colony's net income of $49M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while Lancaster Colony's PE ratio is 32.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.66x for Lancaster Colony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 9.6% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings's net margin of -30.3%. Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.22% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a consensus price target of $66.86, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $119.56 which suggests that it could grow by 3.12%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than JM Smucker.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.480, which suggesting that the stock is 52.041% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.237%.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. Lamb Weston Holdings pays 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, Lamb Weston Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamb Weston Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.75x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.