AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -125.26%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $214.2188, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 24.63%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Intel offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.02x versus 1.54x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 33.29%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat KLA's return on equity of 92.37%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $214.2188, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $789.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.49%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.48%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. KLA offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than KLA's net income of $945.9M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.02x versus 8.32x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 21.47%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $214.2188, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.64 which suggests that it could grow by 47.19%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.02x versus 3.50x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 55.04%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $214.2188, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.00x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.02x versus 29.57x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.