YARIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Molding Technologies has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Yara International ASA's net margin of 4.33%. Yara International ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91%.

Yara International ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.9%. Given that Core Molding Technologies has higher upside potential than Yara International ASA, analysts believe Core Molding Technologies is more attractive than Yara International ASA.

Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.77%.

Yara International ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Core Molding Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yara International ASA pays 2747.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Yara International ASA quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues of $73M. Yara International ASA's net income of $285M is higher than Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Yara International ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Core Molding Technologies's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yara International ASA is 0.48x versus 0.46x for Core Molding Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Elkem ASA has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Yara International ASA's net margin of 1.19%. Yara International ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Elkem ASA's return on equity of 0.15%.

Yara International ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Elkem ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Yara International ASA has higher upside potential than Elkem ASA, analysts believe Yara International ASA is more attractive than Elkem ASA.

Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elkem ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Yara International ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Elkem ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Yara International ASA pays 2747.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Elkem ASA pays out 5298.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yara International ASA quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Elkem ASA quarterly revenues of $719.2M. Yara International ASA's net income of $285M is higher than Elkem ASA's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Yara International ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Elkem ASA's PE ratio is 264.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yara International ASA is 0.48x versus 0.35x for Elkem ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Yara International ASA's net margin of 6.57%. Yara International ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

Yara International ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.93%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Yara International ASA, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Yara International ASA.

Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.687%.

Yara International ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Yara International ASA pays 2747.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Yara International ASA's is not.

Yara International ASA quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. Yara International ASA's net income of $285M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, Yara International ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 10.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yara International ASA is 0.48x versus 1.15x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Yara International ASA's net margin of 1.58%. Yara International ASA's return on equity of 7.38% beat Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 0.04%.

Yara International ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norsk Hydro ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 77.42%. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than Yara International ASA, analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than Yara International ASA.

Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.114%.

Yara International ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Norsk Hydro ASA offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Yara International ASA pays 2747.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Norsk Hydro ASA pays out 350.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yara International ASA quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Yara International ASA's net income of $285M is higher than Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of $73.8M. Notably, Yara International ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.19x while Norsk Hydro ASA's PE ratio is 1,159.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yara International ASA is 0.48x versus 0.62x for Norsk Hydro ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.