CMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Core Molding Technologies's net margin of -0.63%. Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Core Molding Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.9%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Core Molding Technologies has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Core Molding Technologies is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Core Molding Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Core Molding Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Core Molding Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.40x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Molding Technologies is 0.46x versus 0.24x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Core Molding Technologies's net margin of 1.61%. Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Core Molding Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.9%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $67.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.57%. Given that Core Molding Technologies has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Core Molding Technologies is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.793%.

Core Molding Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Core Molding Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Core Molding Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.40x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Molding Technologies is 0.46x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Core Molding Technologies's net margin of --. Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Core Molding Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.9%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 257.04%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Core Molding Technologies, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Core Molding Technologies.

Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

Core Molding Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Molding Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues are $73M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Core Molding Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.40x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Molding Technologies is 0.46x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 4.33% compared to Core Molding Technologies's net margin of --. Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Core Molding Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 45.9%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 155.97%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Core Molding Technologies, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Core Molding Technologies.

Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, which suggesting that the stock is 74.77% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Core Molding Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Core Molding Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues are $73M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Core Molding Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.40x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Core Molding Technologies is 0.46x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.