TCTZF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NetEase has a net margin of 26.56% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 35.73%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 25.44% beat NetEase's return on equity of 23.35%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NetEase has an analysts' consensus of $139.02 which suggests that it could grow by 11.85%. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 92.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetEase has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.359%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. NetEase offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase pays out 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.7B, which are larger than NetEase quarterly revenues of $4B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $6.6B is higher than NetEase's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.57x while NetEase's PE ratio is 17.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.95x versus 5.38x for NetEase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 26.56% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 58.33%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 25.44% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 14.19%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $17.18 which suggests that it could fall by -4.07%. Given that Tencent Music Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Tencent Music Entertainment Group is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 92.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.279%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out 22.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.7B, which are larger than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $1B. Tencent Holdings's net income of $6.6B is higher than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $589.8M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.57x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 21.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.95x versus 6.95x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weibo has a net margin of 26.56% compared to Tencent Holdings's net margin of 26.95%. Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 25.44% beat Weibo's return on equity of 10.25%.

Tencent Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Weibo has an analysts' consensus of $11.25 which suggests that it could grow by 21.45%. Given that Weibo has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe Weibo is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 92.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weibo has a beta of 0.004, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.554%.

Tencent Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.89%. Weibo offers a yield of 8.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Tencent Holdings pays 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Weibo pays out 64.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues are $24.7B, which are larger than Weibo quarterly revenues of $396.9M. Tencent Holdings's net income of $6.6B is higher than Weibo's net income of $107M. Notably, Tencent Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.57x while Weibo's PE ratio is 6.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tencent Holdings is 6.95x versus 1.40x for Weibo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.