NTES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baidu has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NetEase's net margin of 15.22%. NetEase's return on equity of 22.06% beat Baidu's return on equity of 8.68%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $120.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.53%. On the other hand Baidu has an analysts' consensus of $109.44 which suggests that it could grow by 28.67%. Given that Baidu has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe Baidu is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baidu has a beta of 0.328, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.246%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Baidu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Baidu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Baidu quarterly revenues of $4.7B. NetEase's net income of $1.2B is higher than Baidu's net income of $721.6M. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Baidu's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.39x versus 1.60x for Baidu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bilibili has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NetEase's net margin of 1.16%. NetEase's return on equity of 22.06% beat Bilibili's return on equity of -9.64%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $120.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.53%. On the other hand Bilibili has an analysts' consensus of $25.19 which suggests that it could grow by 50.84%. Given that Bilibili has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe Bilibili is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bilibili has a beta of 0.955, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.548%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Bilibili offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Bilibili pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Bilibili quarterly revenues of $1.1B. NetEase's net income of $1.2B is higher than Bilibili's net income of $12.5M. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Bilibili's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.39x versus 1.86x for Bilibili. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Holdings has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NetEase's net margin of 29.76%. NetEase's return on equity of 22.06% beat Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.31%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $120.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.53%. On the other hand Tencent Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

NetEase has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.635%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Tencent Holdings offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. NetEase pays 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings pays out 14.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues of $24B. NetEase's net income of $1.2B is lower than Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.1B. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Tencent Holdings's PE ratio is 17.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.39x versus 6.27x for Tencent Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a net margin of 32.78% compared to NetEase's net margin of 26.24%. NetEase's return on equity of 22.06% beat Tencent Music Entertainment Group's return on equity of 10.49%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $120.10, signalling upside risk potential of 20.53%. On the other hand Tencent Music Entertainment Group has an analysts' consensus of $16.18 which suggests that it could grow by 35.19%. Given that Tencent Music Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe Tencent Music Entertainment Group is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.651, which suggesting that the stock is 34.948% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Music Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.076%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Tencent Music Entertainment Group offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. NetEase pays 37.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Music Entertainment Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Tencent Music Entertainment Group quarterly revenues of $1B. NetEase's net income of $1.2B is higher than Tencent Music Entertainment Group's net income of $272M. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Tencent Music Entertainment Group's PE ratio is 20.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.39x versus 4.73x for Tencent Music Entertainment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.