RCRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 7.67%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.99%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.542, which suggesting that the stock is 54.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.135%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $539.5M. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.55x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 25.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.42x versus 1.74x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of 8.55%. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 11.2%.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.33%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Recruit Holdings, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Recruit Holdings.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.542, which suggesting that the stock is 54.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.137, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.308%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.55x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.42x versus 0.93x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of --. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.542, which suggesting that the stock is 54.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recruit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.55x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.42x versus 2.55x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 13.27% compared to Recruit Holdings's net margin of --. Recruit Holdings's return on equity of 19.87% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Recruit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Recruit Holdings has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Recruit Holdings is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Recruit Holdings has a beta of 1.542, which suggesting that the stock is 54.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Recruit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Recruit Holdings pays 10% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Recruit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Recruit Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Recruit Holdings's net income of $780.5M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Recruit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.55x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Recruit Holdings is 3.42x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.