NTTYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of 7.67%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 11.2% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.99%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.24%. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.135%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $539.5M. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 23.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 0.88x versus 1.59x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of 12.29%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 11.2% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.27%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.24%. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than KDDI.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.097, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.339%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 0.88x versus 1.66x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 11.2% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.24%. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 0.88x versus 3.09x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 8.55% compared to Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net margin of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 11.2% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.24%. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.137, which suggesting that the stock is 86.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues are $22.7B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.9B is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.01x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is 0.88x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.