PWCDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Power Corporation of Canada's net margin of 10.51%. Power Corporation of Canada's return on equity of 6.31% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 53.76%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Power Corporation of Canada, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Power Corporation of Canada.

Power Corporation of Canada has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Corporation of Canada pays 53.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Corporation of Canada's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Power Corporation of Canada quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. Power Corporation of Canada's net income of $488.2M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Power Corporation of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Corporation of Canada is 0.79x versus 5.30x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Power Corporation of Canada's net margin of -11.55%. Power Corporation of Canada's return on equity of 6.31% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could fall by -1.26%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Power Corporation of Canada, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Power Corporation of Canada.

Power Corporation of Canada has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Corporation of Canada pays 53.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Power Corporation of Canada quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Power Corporation of Canada's net income of $488.2M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Power Corporation of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 7.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Corporation of Canada is 0.79x versus 0.55x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Power Corporation of Canada's net margin of -2.92%. Power Corporation of Canada's return on equity of 6.31% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Power Corporation of Canada, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Power Corporation of Canada.

Power Corporation of Canada has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.643%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Corporation of Canada pays 53.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Corporation of Canada's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Power Corporation of Canada quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Power Corporation of Canada's net income of $488.2M is higher than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Power Corporation of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Citizens's PE ratio is 23.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Corporation of Canada is 0.79x versus 0.83x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 7.7% compared to Power Corporation of Canada's net margin of 3.04%. Power Corporation of Canada's return on equity of 6.31% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 2.3%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.73%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Power Corporation of Canada, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Power Corporation of Canada.

Power Corporation of Canada has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.881%.

Power Corporation of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Power Corporation of Canada pays 53.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Corporation of Canada's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Power Corporation of Canada quarterly revenues are $6.3B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Power Corporation of Canada's net income of $488.2M is higher than Genworth Financial's net income of $54M. Notably, Power Corporation of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.42x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 14.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Power Corporation of Canada is 0.79x versus 0.44x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.