CIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Citizens's net margin of -18.21%. Citizens's return on equity of 11.99% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.19%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 100.51%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Citizens's net income of $2.8M is higher than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Abacus Life's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus 4.60x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Citizens's net margin of 8.97%. Citizens's return on equity of 11.99% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.19%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $51.88 which suggests that it could grow by 13.41%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Citizens has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.738%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Citizens's net income of $2.8M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Citizens's net margin of 4.61%. Citizens's return on equity of 11.99% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.19%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.57%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.11399999999999%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Citizens's net income of $2.8M is lower than Genworth Financial's net income of $85M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 32.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus 0.40x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Citizens's net margin of -12.58%. Citizens's return on equity of 11.99% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.19%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Citizens has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.788, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.845%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Citizens's net income of $2.8M is higher than Lincoln National's net income of -$528M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.67x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus 0.38x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.