PTOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clean Harbors has a net margin of -- compared to Plastic2Oil's net margin of 5.87%. Plastic2Oil's return on equity of -- beat Clean Harbors's return on equity of 16.62%.

Plastic2Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clean Harbors has an analysts' consensus of $250.93 which suggests that it could grow by 17.29%. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Plastic2Oil, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Plastic2Oil.

Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.322, which suggesting that the stock is 132.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.278%.

Plastic2Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clean Harbors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plastic2Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clean Harbors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clean Harbors quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Plastic2Oil's net income of -- is lower than Clean Harbors's net income of $84M. Notably, Plastic2Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clean Harbors's PE ratio is 28.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plastic2Oil is -- versus 1.97x for Clean Harbors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Green Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Plastic2Oil's net margin of --. Plastic2Oil's return on equity of -- beat Pacific Green Technologies's return on equity of --.

Plastic2Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plastic2Oil has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, analysts believe Plastic2Oil is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies.

Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.322, which suggesting that the stock is 132.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies has a beta of 0.550, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.019%.

Plastic2Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Green Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plastic2Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Green Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Plastic2Oil's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Green Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Plastic2Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacific Green Technologies's PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plastic2Oil is -- versus 0.25x for Pacific Green Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of -- compared to Plastic2Oil's net margin of --. Plastic2Oil's return on equity of -- beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Plastic2Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plastic2Oil has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Plastic2Oil is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.322, which suggesting that the stock is 132.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Plastic2Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plastic2Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Plastic2Oil's net income of -- is lower than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Plastic2Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plastic2Oil is -- versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management has a net margin of -- compared to Plastic2Oil's net margin of 10.59%. Plastic2Oil's return on equity of -- beat Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94%.

Plastic2Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Waste Management has an analysts' consensus of $244.67 which suggests that it could grow by 4.61%. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Plastic2Oil, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Plastic2Oil.

Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.322, which suggesting that the stock is 132.198% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.562%.

Plastic2Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Plastic2Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management pays out 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Waste Management quarterly revenues of $6B. Plastic2Oil's net income of -- is lower than Waste Management's net income of $637M. Notably, Plastic2Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waste Management's PE ratio is 35.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plastic2Oil is -- versus 4.11x for Waste Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.