CLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pacific Green Technologies has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of --. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 16.62% beat Pacific Green Technologies's return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $252.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.58%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies has a beta of 0.572, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.835%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Green Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors's net income of $84M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while Pacific Green Technologies's PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 1.88x versus 0.25x for Pacific Green Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plastic2Oil has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of --. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 16.62% beat Plastic2Oil's return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $252.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.58%. On the other hand Plastic2Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Plastic2Oil, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Plastic2Oil.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.517%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plastic2Oil offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plastic2Oil pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors's net income of $84M is higher than Plastic2Oil's net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while Plastic2Oil's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 1.88x versus -- for Plastic2Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of --. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 16.62% beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $252.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.58%. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors's net income of $84M is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 1.88x versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management has a net margin of 5.87% compared to Clean Harbors's net margin of 10.15%. Clean Harbors's return on equity of 16.62% beat Waste Management's return on equity of 36.47%.

Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $252.60, signalling upside risk potential of 23.58%. On the other hand Waste Management has an analysts' consensus of $239.47 which suggests that it could grow by 5.23%. Given that Clean Harbors has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Clean Harbors is more attractive than Waste Management.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 1.107, which suggesting that the stock is 10.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.615%.

Clean Harbors has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Clean Harbors pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management pays out 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Harbors quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Waste Management quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Clean Harbors's net income of $84M is lower than Waste Management's net income of $598M. Notably, Clean Harbors's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.55x while Waste Management's PE ratio is 33.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors is 1.88x versus 4.16x for Waste Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.