Financhill
Sell
41

NUFMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$2.68
Seasonality move :
-3.85%
Day range:
$2.68 - $2.68
52-week range:
$2.16 - $3.48
Dividend yield:
2.22%
P/E ratio:
101.84x
P/S ratio:
0.46x
P/B ratio:
0.67x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-23.65%
Market cap:
$1B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NUFMF
Nufarm
-- -- -- -- --
BHP
BHP Group
-- -- -- -- $51.90
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
-- -- -- -- --
IAUFF
AIC Mines
-- -- -- -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals
-- -- -- -- --
SMSMY
Sims
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NUFMF
Nufarm
$2.68 -- $1B 101.84x $0.03 2.22% 0.46x
BHP
BHP Group
$48.83 $51.90 $123.9B 10.89x $1.00 5.08% 2.31x
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
$0.0370 -- $23.8M 0.76x $0.03 0% 0.11x
IAUFF
AIC Mines
$0.26 -- $151.5M 16.89x $0.00 0% 1.22x
NVA
Nova Minerals
$12.93 -- $67.7M -- $0.00 0% --
SMSMY
Sims
$9.74 -- $1.9B 36.02x $0.06 1.33% 0.43x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NUFMF
Nufarm
30.08% -0.193 61.93% 1.07x
BHP
BHP Group
30.73% 0.426 15.79% 1.21x
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
-- -4.353 -- --
IAUFF
AIC Mines
10.79% 1.889 17.99% 2.38x
NVA
Nova Minerals
-- 0.000 -- --
SMSMY
Sims
17.81% -0.020 25.96% 0.94x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NUFMF
Nufarm
-- -- -0.19% -0.29% -- --
BHP
BHP Group
-- -- 16.7% 23.67% -- --
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
-- -- -- -- -- --
IAUFF
AIC Mines
-- -- 6.29% 6.71% -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals
-- -- -- -- -- --
SMSMY
Sims
-- -- -3.4% -4.33% -- --

Nufarm vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NUFMF or BHP?

    BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    -- -- $2.2B
    BHP
    BHP Group
    -- -- $69.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About NUFMF or BHP?

    Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $51.90 which suggests that it could grow by 6.29%. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Nufarm, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Nufarm.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0 0 0
    BHP
    BHP Group
    3 3 0
  • Is NUFMF or BHP More Risky?

    Nufarm has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.524% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.85%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUFMF or BHP?

    Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NUFMF or BHP?

    Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 101.84x while BHP Group's PE ratio is 10.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.46x versus 2.31x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0.46x 101.84x -- --
    BHP
    BHP Group
    2.31x 10.89x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns NUFMF or GSMGF?

    Indiana Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Indiana Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    -- -- $2.2B
    GSMGF
    Indiana Resources
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About NUFMF or GSMGF?

    Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Indiana Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nufarm has higher upside potential than Indiana Resources, analysts believe Nufarm is more attractive than Indiana Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0 0 0
    GSMGF
    Indiana Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is NUFMF or GSMGF More Risky?

    Nufarm has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.524% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indiana Resources has a beta of 4.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 341.564%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUFMF or GSMGF?

    Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Indiana Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Indiana Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NUFMF or GSMGF?

    Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Indiana Resources quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Indiana Resources's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 101.84x while Indiana Resources's PE ratio is 0.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.46x versus 0.11x for Indiana Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0.46x 101.84x -- --
    GSMGF
    Indiana Resources
    0.11x 0.76x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns NUFMF or IAUFF?

    AIC Mines has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    -- -- $2.2B
    IAUFF
    AIC Mines
    -- -- $159.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About NUFMF or IAUFF?

    Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AIC Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nufarm has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe Nufarm is more attractive than AIC Mines.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0 0 0
    IAUFF
    AIC Mines
    0 0 0
  • Is NUFMF or IAUFF More Risky?

    Nufarm has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.524% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AIC Mines has a beta of 0.297, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.343%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUFMF or IAUFF?

    Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. AIC Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. AIC Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NUFMF or IAUFF?

    Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AIC Mines quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than AIC Mines's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 101.84x while AIC Mines's PE ratio is 16.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.46x versus 1.22x for AIC Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0.46x 101.84x -- --
    IAUFF
    AIC Mines
    1.22x 16.89x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns NUFMF or NVA?

    Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    -- -- $2.2B
    NVA
    Nova Minerals
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About NUFMF or NVA?

    Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.35%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Nufarm, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Nufarm.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0 0 0
    NVA
    Nova Minerals
    0 0 0
  • Is NUFMF or NVA More Risky?

    Nufarm has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.524% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUFMF or NVA?

    Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NUFMF or NVA?

    Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 101.84x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.46x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0.46x 101.84x -- --
    NVA
    Nova Minerals
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns NUFMF or SMSMY?

    Sims has a net margin of -- compared to Nufarm's net margin of --. Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29% beat Sims's return on equity of -4.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    -- -- $2.2B
    SMSMY
    Sims
    -- -- $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NUFMF or SMSMY?

    Nufarm has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sims has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nufarm has higher upside potential than Sims, analysts believe Nufarm is more attractive than Sims.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0 0 0
    SMSMY
    Sims
    0 0 0
  • Is NUFMF or SMSMY More Risky?

    Nufarm has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.524% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sims has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.002%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUFMF or SMSMY?

    Nufarm has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Sims offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Nufarm pays -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Sims pays out -70.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NUFMF or SMSMY?

    Nufarm quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sims quarterly revenues of --. Nufarm's net income of -- is lower than Sims's net income of --. Notably, Nufarm's price-to-earnings ratio is 101.84x while Sims's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nufarm is 0.46x versus 0.43x for Sims. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NUFMF
    Nufarm
    0.46x 101.84x -- --
    SMSMY
    Sims
    0.43x 36.02x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Salesforce Stock Drop After a Strong Quarter?
Why Did Salesforce Stock Drop After a Strong Quarter?

Popular customer relationship management platform provider Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) has been…

Is Adobe Stock a Bargain With AI Tools Driving Growth?
Is Adobe Stock a Bargain With AI Tools Driving Growth?

The share price of American computer software company Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)…

Is Palantir Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Is Palantir Stock a Millionaire Maker?

Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has shot upward over the last year and…

Stock Ideas

Buy
71
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
4
CABO alert for May 3

Cable One [CABO] is down 41.98% over the past day.

Buy
55
PDEX alert for May 3

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 32.02% over the past day.

Buy
91
TRUP alert for May 3

Trupanion [TRUP] is up 23.52% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock