IAUFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Indiana Resources has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Indiana Resources's return on equity of --.

AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Indiana Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines has higher upside potential than Indiana Resources, analysts believe AIC Mines is more attractive than Indiana Resources.

AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indiana Resources has a beta of 3.814, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 281.374%.

AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Indiana Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Indiana Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Indiana Resources quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Indiana Resources's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.20x while Indiana Resources's PE ratio is 0.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 0.67x versus 0.10x for Indiana Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 100.16%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than AIC Mines.

AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.20x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 0.67x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Power Minerals's return on equity of -63.5%.

AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines has higher upside potential than Power Minerals, analysts believe AIC Mines is more attractive than Power Minerals.

AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Minerals has a beta of -5.219, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 621.927%.

AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Minerals quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Power Minerals's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.20x while Power Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 0.67x versus 207.50x for Power Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sims has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Sims's return on equity of -4.33%.

AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sims has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines has higher upside potential than Sims, analysts believe AIC Mines is more attractive than Sims.

AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sims has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.13%.

AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sims offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sims pays out -70.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sims quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Sims's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.20x while Sims's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 0.67x versus 0.38x for Sims. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.