KMAAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 46.4%.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.300, which suggesting that the stock is 129.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.205%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 70.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 34.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 6.60x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 4.38%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 38.1%.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.300, which suggesting that the stock is 129.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.111%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 100.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $337M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 19.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 0.93x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGS AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.300, which suggesting that the stock is 129.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.006%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 2.77x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 9.18%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of -0.87% beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 20.5%.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.300, which suggesting that the stock is 129.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.141%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share. Komax Holding AG pays -477.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $298.3M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 30.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.89x versus 2.71x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.