SHLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geberit AG has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 20.5% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 46.4%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.205%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 70.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $298.3M is higher than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.57x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 33.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.71x versus 6.52x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of 4.38%. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 20.5% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 38.1%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.111%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 5.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 100.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kuehne + Nagel International AG's is not.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $298.3M is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $337M. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.57x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 19.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.71x versus 0.92x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 20.5% beat OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's return on equity of 5.96%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon pays out 98.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $298.3M is higher than OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.57x while OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon's PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.71x versus 0.45x for OC Oerlikon Corp AG, Pfaffikon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGS AG has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 20.5% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.006%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $6.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 56.63% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $298.3M is higher than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.57x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.71x versus 2.77x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.