IPXHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fuji Oil has a net margin of 13.8% compared to Inpex's net margin of 2.16%. Inpex's return on equity of 7.98% beat Fuji Oil's return on equity of 19.41%.

Inpex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fuji Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inpex has higher upside potential than Fuji Oil, analysts believe Inpex is more attractive than Fuji Oil.

Inpex has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuji Oil has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Inpex has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Fuji Oil offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Inpex pays 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuji Oil pays out 4.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inpex quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Fuji Oil quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Inpex's net income of $517.3M is higher than Fuji Oil's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Inpex's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Fuji Oil's PE ratio is 9.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inpex is 1.02x versus 0.20x for Fuji Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idemitsu Kosan has a net margin of 13.8% compared to Inpex's net margin of 4.2%. Inpex's return on equity of 7.98% beat Idemitsu Kosan's return on equity of 13.14%.

Inpex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Idemitsu Kosan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inpex has higher upside potential than Idemitsu Kosan, analysts believe Inpex is more attractive than Idemitsu Kosan.

Inpex has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idemitsu Kosan has a beta of 0.049, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.069%.

Inpex has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Idemitsu Kosan offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Inpex pays 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Idemitsu Kosan pays out 17.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inpex quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Idemitsu Kosan quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Inpex's net income of $517.3M is lower than Idemitsu Kosan's net income of $609.5M. Notably, Inpex's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Idemitsu Kosan's PE ratio is 4.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inpex is 1.02x versus 0.14x for Idemitsu Kosan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Japan Petroleum Exploration has a net margin of 13.8% compared to Inpex's net margin of 12.85%. Inpex's return on equity of 7.98% beat Japan Petroleum Exploration's return on equity of 10.79%.

Inpex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Petroleum Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inpex has higher upside potential than Japan Petroleum Exploration, analysts believe Inpex is more attractive than Japan Petroleum Exploration.

Inpex has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Petroleum Exploration has a beta of -0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.786%.

Inpex has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Japan Petroleum Exploration offers a yield of 5.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Inpex pays 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Petroleum Exploration pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inpex quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Japan Petroleum Exploration quarterly revenues of $573.9M. Inpex's net income of $517.3M is higher than Japan Petroleum Exploration's net income of $73.7M. Notably, Inpex's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while Japan Petroleum Exploration's PE ratio is 5.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inpex is 1.02x versus 0.80x for Japan Petroleum Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ENEOS Holdings has a net margin of 13.8% compared to Inpex's net margin of 2.58%. Inpex's return on equity of 7.98% beat ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 8.23%.

Inpex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ENEOS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Inpex has higher upside potential than ENEOS Holdings, analysts believe Inpex is more attractive than ENEOS Holdings.

Inpex has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.574%.

Inpex has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. ENEOS Holdings offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Inpex pays 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. ENEOS Holdings pays out 23.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Inpex quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Inpex's net income of $517.3M is lower than ENEOS Holdings's net income of $523.7M. Notably, Inpex's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.21x while ENEOS Holdings's PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Inpex is 1.02x versus 0.18x for ENEOS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.