CEHCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Idemitsu Kosan has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 4.2%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 11.81% beat Idemitsu Kosan's return on equity of 13.14%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Idemitsu Kosan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Idemitsu Kosan, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than Idemitsu Kosan.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idemitsu Kosan has a beta of 0.049, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.069%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.75%. Idemitsu Kosan offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Idemitsu Kosan pays out 17.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Idemitsu Kosan quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $158.4M is lower than Idemitsu Kosan's net income of $609.5M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.41x while Idemitsu Kosan's PE ratio is 4.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.14x for Idemitsu Kosan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inpex has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 13.8%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 11.81% beat Inpex's return on equity of 7.98%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inpex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Inpex, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than Inpex.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inpex has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.366%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.75%. Inpex offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Inpex pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Inpex quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $158.4M is lower than Inpex's net income of $517.3M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.41x while Inpex's PE ratio is 6.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 1.02x for Inpex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Japan Petroleum Exploration has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 12.85%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 11.81% beat Japan Petroleum Exploration's return on equity of 10.79%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Japan Petroleum Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than Japan Petroleum Exploration, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than Japan Petroleum Exploration.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Petroleum Exploration has a beta of -0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.786%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.75%. Japan Petroleum Exploration offers a yield of 5.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Petroleum Exploration pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Japan Petroleum Exploration quarterly revenues of $573.9M. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $158.4M is higher than Japan Petroleum Exploration's net income of $73.7M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.41x while Japan Petroleum Exploration's PE ratio is 5.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.80x for Japan Petroleum Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ENEOS Holdings has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Cosmo Energy Holdings's net margin of 2.58%. Cosmo Energy Holdings's return on equity of 11.81% beat ENEOS Holdings's return on equity of 8.23%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ENEOS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cosmo Energy Holdings has higher upside potential than ENEOS Holdings, analysts believe Cosmo Energy Holdings is more attractive than ENEOS Holdings.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ENEOS Holdings has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.574%.

Cosmo Energy Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.75%. ENEOS Holdings offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Cosmo Energy Holdings pays 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. ENEOS Holdings pays out 23.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cosmo Energy Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than ENEOS Holdings quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Cosmo Energy Holdings's net income of $158.4M is lower than ENEOS Holdings's net income of $523.7M. Notably, Cosmo Energy Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.41x while ENEOS Holdings's PE ratio is 7.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cosmo Energy Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.18x for ENEOS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.