CRZBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deutsche Boerse AG has a net margin of 18.24% compared to Commerzbank AG's net margin of 28.12%. Commerzbank AG's return on equity of 7.86% beat Deutsche Boerse AG's return on equity of 18.23%.

Commerzbank AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Deutsche Boerse AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commerzbank AG has higher upside potential than Deutsche Boerse AG, analysts believe Commerzbank AG is more attractive than Deutsche Boerse AG.

Commerzbank AG has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deutsche Boerse AG has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.817%.

Commerzbank AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deutsche Boerse AG offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Commerzbank AG pays 15.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Deutsche Boerse AG pays out 35.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commerzbank AG quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Deutsche Boerse AG quarterly revenues of $2B. Commerzbank AG's net income of $800.5M is higher than Deutsche Boerse AG's net income of $552.3M. Notably, Commerzbank AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while Deutsche Boerse AG's PE ratio is 28.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commerzbank AG is 2.55x versus 7.80x for Deutsche Boerse AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hannover Rueck SE has a net margin of 18.24% compared to Commerzbank AG's net margin of -3.22%. Commerzbank AG's return on equity of 7.86% beat Hannover Rueck SE's return on equity of 19.78%.

Commerzbank AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hannover Rueck SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commerzbank AG has higher upside potential than Hannover Rueck SE, analysts believe Commerzbank AG is more attractive than Hannover Rueck SE.

Commerzbank AG has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hannover Rueck SE has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.312%.

Commerzbank AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hannover Rueck SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share. Commerzbank AG pays 15.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hannover Rueck SE pays out 39.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commerzbank AG quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Hannover Rueck SE quarterly revenues of -$16.7B. Commerzbank AG's net income of $800.5M is higher than Hannover Rueck SE's net income of $537.6M. Notably, Commerzbank AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while Hannover Rueck SE's PE ratio is 15.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commerzbank AG is 2.55x versus 12.17x for Hannover Rueck SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG has a net margin of 18.24% compared to Commerzbank AG's net margin of -11.36%. Commerzbank AG's return on equity of 7.86% beat Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG's return on equity of 18.23%.

Commerzbank AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commerzbank AG has higher upside potential than Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG, analysts believe Commerzbank AG is more attractive than Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG.

Commerzbank AG has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.001%.

Commerzbank AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Commerzbank AG pays 15.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG pays out 35.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commerzbank AG quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG quarterly revenues of -$9.3B. Commerzbank AG's net income of $800.5M is lower than Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Commerzbank AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG's PE ratio is 14.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commerzbank AG is 2.55x versus 1.95x for Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProCredit Holding AG has a net margin of 18.24% compared to Commerzbank AG's net margin of 25.36%. Commerzbank AG's return on equity of 7.86% beat ProCredit Holding AG's return on equity of 10.39%.

Commerzbank AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProCredit Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commerzbank AG has higher upside potential than ProCredit Holding AG, analysts believe Commerzbank AG is more attractive than ProCredit Holding AG.

Commerzbank AG has a beta of 0.690, which suggesting that the stock is 30.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProCredit Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Commerzbank AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProCredit Holding AG offers a yield of 7.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Commerzbank AG pays 15.5% of its earnings as a dividend. ProCredit Holding AG pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commerzbank AG quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than ProCredit Holding AG quarterly revenues of $117.9M. Commerzbank AG's net income of $800.5M is higher than ProCredit Holding AG's net income of $29.9M. Notably, Commerzbank AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while ProCredit Holding AG's PE ratio is 4.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commerzbank AG is 2.55x versus 1.10x for ProCredit Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.