BYDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of 5.46% compared to BYD's net margin of 7.96%. BYD's return on equity of 24.26% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.36%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $32.69 which suggests that it could grow by 41.86%. Given that Li Auto has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Li Auto is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.542% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $38.2B, which are larger than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $6.2B. BYD's net income of $2.1B is higher than Li Auto's net income of $489.6M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 21.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.18x versus 1.22x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 5.46% compared to BYD's net margin of -36.2%. BYD's return on equity of 24.26% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.60 which suggests that it could grow by 61.97%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.542% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.737, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.73%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $38.2B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. BYD's net income of $2.1B is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.18x versus 0.78x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 5.46% compared to BYD's net margin of 9.17%. BYD's return on equity of 24.26% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $323.87 which suggests that it could grow by 35.27%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.542% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $38.2B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. BYD's net income of $2.1B is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Tesla's PE ratio is 117.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.18x versus 8.57x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 5.46% compared to BYD's net margin of -8.26%. BYD's return on equity of 24.26% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.15 which suggests that it could grow by 24.28%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.175, which suggesting that the stock is 82.542% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $38.2B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BYD's net income of $2.1B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.18x versus 3.23x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.