JD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dada Nexus has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of -50.44%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat Dada Nexus's return on equity of -42.07%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 49.33%. On the other hand Dada Nexus has an analysts' consensus of $2.35 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Dada Nexus, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Dada Nexus.

JD.com has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.465% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dada Nexus has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Dada Nexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dada Nexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than Dada Nexus quarterly revenues of $338.1M. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is higher than Dada Nexus's net income of -$170.5M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.72x while Dada Nexus's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 0.36x for Dada Nexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDD Holdings has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of 24.81%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 49.33%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $148.34 which suggests that it could grow by 63.91%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than JD.com, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than JD.com.

JD.com has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.465% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.041%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $15.4B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is lower than PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.72x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 8.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 2.44x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of -8.26%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.11%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 49.33%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $24.34 which suggests that it could grow by 21.68%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than XPeng.

JD.com has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.465% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JD.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is higher than XPeng's net income of -$184.8M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.72x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 3.32x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum China Holdings has a net margin of 2.84% compared to JD.com's net margin of 4.43%. JD.com's return on equity of 13.91% beat Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.66%.

JD.com has a consensus price target of $54.39, signalling upside risk potential of 49.33%. On the other hand Yum China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.32 which suggests that it could grow by 35.89%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Yum China Holdings, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Yum China Holdings.

JD.com has a beta of 0.525, which suggesting that the stock is 47.465% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.542%.

JD.com has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Yum China Holdings offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. JD.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

JD.com quarterly revenues are $48.2B, which are larger than Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. JD.com's net income of $1.4B is higher than Yum China Holdings's net income of $115M. Notably, JD.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.72x while Yum China Holdings's PE ratio is 19.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JD.com is 0.35x versus 1.53x for Yum China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.