Is The Trade Desk a Screaming Buy?
One factor that sets programmatic advertising platform The Trade Desk…
Sell
49
BABA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$109.10
Seasonality move
:
6.67%
Day range:
$108.42 - $111.52
52-week range:
$68.36 - $148.43
Dividend yield:
1.84%
P/E ratio:
15.74x
P/S ratio:
1.94x
P/B ratio:
1.90x
Volume:
17.9M
Avg. volume:
28.1M
1-year change:
58.2%
Market cap:
$259.9B
Revenue:
$131.6B
EPS (TTM):
$6.92
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$32.3B | $1.73 | 5.22% | 78.26% | $161.03 |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
$155.1B | $1.36 | 9.39% | 12.84% | $251.50 |
|
JD
JD.com
|
$39.3B | $0.94 | 7.16% | 9.12% | $53.87 |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
$14B | $2.57 | 16.45% | -1.52% | $148.27 |
|
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
|
$1B | -$0.73 | -17.51% | -50.06% | $14.30 |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$21.5B | $0.42 | 12.37% | 53.31% | $311.27 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$108.87 | $161.03 | $259.9B | 15.74x | $1.66 | 1.84% | 1.94x |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
$172.61 | $251.50 | $1.8T | 31.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.90x |
|
JD
JD.com
|
$34.72 | $53.87 | $50.4B | 9.26x | $1.00 | 2.88% | 0.33x |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
$93.69 | $148.27 | $130.1B | 8.85x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.53x |
|
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
|
$11.60 | $14.30 | $13.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.36x |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$241.37 | $311.27 | $776.4B | 118.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 8.64x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
18.78% | -0.203 | 14.77% | 1.39x |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
15.54% | 1.330 | 2.26% | 0.87x |
|
JD
JD.com
|
21.11% | 0.190 | 14.51% | 0.88x |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
1.67% | -0.409 | 0.54% | 1.82x |
|
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
|
40.38% | 1.937 | 29.52% | 3.62x |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
9.75% | 2.160 | 0.61% | 1.42x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$16.3B | $6.6B | 9.36% | 11.03% | 20.32% | $13.9B |
|
AMZN
Amazon.com
|
$37.4B | $21.2B | 20.04% | 24.69% | 12.21% | $17.8B |
|
JD
JD.com
|
$7.4B | $1.3B | 11.67% | 13.91% | 3.61% | $3.5B |
|
PDD
PDD Holdings
|
$8.7B | $3.6B | 43.89% | 44.83% | 29.3% | $4.1B |
|
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
|
$170M | -$661M | -39.04% | -65.03% | -38.01% | $856M |
|
TSLA
Tesla
|
$4.2B | $1.6B | 9.57% | 10.47% | 11.13% | $2B |
Alibaba Group Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or AMZN?
Amazon.com has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 10.65%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding41.99% $2.84 $181.7B AMZNAmazon.com19.9% $1.86 $338.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $161.03, signalling upside risk potential of 47.91%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $251.50 which suggests that it could grow by 45.7%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Amazon.com.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding29 3 0 AMZNAmazon.com47 4 0 -
Is BABA or AMZN More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 76.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.882%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or AMZN?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $187.8B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $20B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 31.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.94x versus 2.90x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.94x 15.74x $38.9B $6.8B AMZNAmazon.com2.90x 31.21x $187.8B $20B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or JD?
JD.com has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 2.84%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat JD.com's return on equity of 13.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding41.99% $2.84 $181.7B JDJD.com15.31% $0.90 $51.7B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $161.03, signalling upside risk potential of 47.91%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $53.87 which suggests that it could grow by 55.17%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding29 3 0 JDJD.com28 3 0 -
Is BABA or JD More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 76.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.465%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. JD.com offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or JD?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than JD.com's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while JD.com's PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.94x versus 0.33x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.94x 15.74x $38.9B $6.8B JDJD.com0.33x 9.26x $48.2B $1.4B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or PDD?
PDD Holdings has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 24.81%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding41.99% $2.84 $181.7B PDDPDD Holdings56.79% $2.57 $43.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or PDD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $161.03, signalling upside risk potential of 47.91%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $148.27 which suggests that it could grow by 58.25%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding29 3 0 PDDPDD Holdings28 8 0 -
Is BABA or PDD More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 76.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.041%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or PDD?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or PDD?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $15.4B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 8.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.94x versus 2.53x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.94x 15.74x $38.9B $6.8B PDDPDD Holdings2.53x 8.85x $15.4B $3.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or RIVN?
Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of -42.85%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding41.99% $2.84 $181.7B RIVNRivian Automotive9.8% -$0.70 $11B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or RIVN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $161.03, signalling upside risk potential of 47.91%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.30 which suggests that it could grow by 23.26%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding29 3 0 RIVNRivian Automotive7 16 0 -
Is BABA or RIVN More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 76.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or RIVN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or RIVN?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.94x versus 2.36x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.94x 15.74x $38.9B $6.8B RIVNRivian Automotive2.36x -- $1.7B -$743M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABA or TSLA?
Tesla has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 9.17%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAAlibaba Group Holding41.99% $2.84 $181.7B TSLATesla16.26% $0.66 $81.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $161.03, signalling upside risk potential of 47.91%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $311.27 which suggests that it could grow by 28.96%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Tesla.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAAlibaba Group Holding29 3 0 TSLATesla16 14 9 -
Is BABA or TSLA More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.240, which suggesting that the stock is 76.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABA or TSLA?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.74x while Tesla's PE ratio is 118.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 1.94x versus 8.64x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAAlibaba Group Holding1.94x 15.74x $38.9B $6.8B TSLATesla8.64x 118.32x $25.7B $2.4B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is IQQQ High Income ETF Good to Buy?
The Proshares NASDAQ-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) is a covered…
Can Spotify Ever Become Consistently Profitable?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) owns more than 30% market share as the most…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
47
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.5T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Sell
23
UNH alert for Apr 21
UnitedHealth Group [UNH] is down 6.42% over the past day.
Sell
30
MAN alert for Apr 21
ManpowerGroup [MAN] is down 0.22% over the past day.
Sell
24
GPN alert for Apr 21
Global Payments [GPN] is down 2.84% over the past day.
