BRNGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bounty Oil & Gas NL has a net margin of -- compared to Buru Energy's net margin of --. Buru Energy's return on equity of -- beat Bounty Oil & Gas NL's return on equity of -16.5%.

Buru Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bounty Oil & Gas NL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Buru Energy has higher upside potential than Bounty Oil & Gas NL, analysts believe Buru Energy is more attractive than Bounty Oil & Gas NL.

Buru Energy has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bounty Oil & Gas NL has a beta of 8.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 730.403%.

Buru Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bounty Oil & Gas NL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Buru Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bounty Oil & Gas NL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Buru Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bounty Oil & Gas NL quarterly revenues of --. Buru Energy's net income of -- is lower than Bounty Oil & Gas NL's net income of --. Notably, Buru Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bounty Oil & Gas NL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Buru Energy is 1.74x versus 4.11x for Bounty Oil & Gas NL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Santos has a net margin of -- compared to Buru Energy's net margin of --. Buru Energy's return on equity of -- beat Santos's return on equity of 8.28%.

Buru Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Santos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Buru Energy has higher upside potential than Santos, analysts believe Buru Energy is more attractive than Santos.

Buru Energy has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Santos has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.74%.

Buru Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Santos offers a yield of 7.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Buru Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Santos pays out 54.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Santos's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Buru Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Santos quarterly revenues of --. Buru Energy's net income of -- is lower than Santos's net income of --. Notably, Buru Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Santos's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Buru Energy is 1.74x versus 2.38x for Santos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tamboran Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Buru Energy's net margin of --. Buru Energy's return on equity of -- beat Tamboran Resources's return on equity of --.

Buru Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tamboran Resources has an analysts' consensus of $40.80 which suggests that it could grow by 124.55%. Given that Tamboran Resources has higher upside potential than Buru Energy, analysts believe Tamboran Resources is more attractive than Buru Energy.

Buru Energy has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tamboran Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Buru Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tamboran Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Buru Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tamboran Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Buru Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tamboran Resources quarterly revenues of --. Buru Energy's net income of -- is lower than Tamboran Resources's net income of -$5.9M. Notably, Buru Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tamboran Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Buru Energy is 1.74x versus -- for Tamboran Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodside Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to Buru Energy's net margin of --. Buru Energy's return on equity of -- beat Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 5.17%.

Buru Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Woodside Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.76%. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Buru Energy, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Buru Energy.

Buru Energy has a beta of 1.125, which suggesting that the stock is 12.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.627%.

Buru Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodside Energy Group offers a yield of 8.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Buru Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodside Energy Group pays out 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend.

Buru Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Buru Energy's net income of -- is lower than Woodside Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Buru Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Woodside Energy Group's PE ratio is 15.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Buru Energy is 1.74x versus 2.30x for Woodside Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.