WDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Buru Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 5.17% beat Buru Energy's return on equity of --.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 90.76%. On the other hand Buru Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Buru Energy, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Buru Energy.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Buru Energy has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.49%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. Buru Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Buru Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Buru Energy quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Buru Energy's net income of --. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Buru Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.30x versus 1.74x for Buru Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chevron has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of 9.17%. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 5.17% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.33%.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 90.76%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $175.06 which suggests that it could grow by 22.9%. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Chevron.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.462%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 53.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Woodside Energy Group's is not.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.9B. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Chevron's net income of $4.5B. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.30x versus 1.36x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Santos has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 5.17% beat Santos's return on equity of 8.28%.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 90.76%. On the other hand Santos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Woodside Energy Group has higher upside potential than Santos, analysts believe Woodside Energy Group is more attractive than Santos.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Santos has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.74%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. Santos offers a yield of 7.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Santos pays out 54.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Santos's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Woodside Energy Group's is not.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Santos quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Santos's net income of --. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Santos's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.30x versus 2.38x for Santos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tamboran Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Woodside Energy Group's net margin of --. Woodside Energy Group's return on equity of 5.17% beat Tamboran Resources's return on equity of --.

Woodside Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 90.76%. On the other hand Tamboran Resources has an analysts' consensus of $40.80 which suggests that it could grow by 124.55%. Given that Tamboran Resources has higher upside potential than Woodside Energy Group, analysts believe Tamboran Resources is more attractive than Woodside Energy Group.

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 1.106, which suggesting that the stock is 10.627% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tamboran Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Woodside Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.52%. Tamboran Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodside Energy Group pays 256.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Tamboran Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Woodside Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tamboran Resources quarterly revenues of --. Woodside Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Tamboran Resources's net income of -$5.9M. Notably, Woodside Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.59x while Tamboran Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodside Energy Group is 2.30x versus -- for Tamboran Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.