AAGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenlane Holdings has a net margin of -3671.53% compared to African Agriculture Holdings's net margin of -528.93%. African Agriculture Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -225.34%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenlane Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1330545%. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than African Agriculture Holdings, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than African Agriculture Holdings.

African Agriculture Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.164%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenlane Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. African Agriculture Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenlane Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

African Agriculture Holdings quarterly revenues are $344.9K, which are smaller than Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7M. African Agriculture Holdings's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, African Agriculture Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenlane Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for African Agriculture Holdings is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Greenlane Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Local Bounti has a net margin of -3671.53% compared to African Agriculture Holdings's net margin of -335.16%. African Agriculture Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Local Bounti's return on equity of -466.66%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Local Bounti has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 223.28%. Given that Local Bounti has higher upside potential than African Agriculture Holdings, analysts believe Local Bounti is more attractive than African Agriculture Holdings.

African Agriculture Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Local Bounti has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Local Bounti offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. African Agriculture Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Local Bounti pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

African Agriculture Holdings quarterly revenues are $344.9K, which are smaller than Local Bounti quarterly revenues of $10.2M. African Agriculture Holdings's net income of -$12.7M is higher than Local Bounti's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, African Agriculture Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Local Bounti's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for African Agriculture Holdings is 0.00x versus 0.52x for Local Bounti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pioneer Green Farms has a net margin of -3671.53% compared to African Agriculture Holdings's net margin of -3784581.4%. African Agriculture Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Pioneer Green Farms's return on equity of --.

African Agriculture Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pioneer Green Farms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that African Agriculture Holdings has higher upside potential than Pioneer Green Farms, analysts believe African Agriculture Holdings is more attractive than Pioneer Green Farms.

African Agriculture Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pioneer Green Farms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pioneer Green Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. African Agriculture Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pioneer Green Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

African Agriculture Holdings quarterly revenues are $344.9K, which are larger than Pioneer Green Farms quarterly revenues of $40. African Agriculture Holdings's net income of -$12.7M is lower than Pioneer Green Farms's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, African Agriculture Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pioneer Green Farms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for African Agriculture Holdings is 0.00x versus 238.20x for Pioneer Green Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

22nd Century Group has a net margin of -3671.53% compared to African Agriculture Holdings's net margin of -247.47%. African Agriculture Holdings's return on equity of -- beat 22nd Century Group's return on equity of -832.63%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 22nd Century Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 972873.95%. Given that 22nd Century Group has higher upside potential than African Agriculture Holdings, analysts believe 22nd Century Group is more attractive than African Agriculture Holdings.

African Agriculture Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 22nd Century Group has a beta of 1.952, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.208%.

African Agriculture Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 22nd Century Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. African Agriculture Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 22nd Century Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

African Agriculture Holdings quarterly revenues are $344.9K, which are smaller than 22nd Century Group quarterly revenues of $1.8M. African Agriculture Holdings's net income of -$12.7M is lower than 22nd Century Group's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, African Agriculture Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 22nd Century Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for African Agriculture Holdings is 0.00x versus 0.02x for 22nd Century Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.