GNLN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Local Bounti has a net margin of -528.93% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -335.16%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -225.34% beat Local Bounti's return on equity of -466.66%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 877559.47%. On the other hand Local Bounti has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 213.81%. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Local Bounti, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Local Bounti.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Local Bounti has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Local Bounti offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Local Bounti pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than Local Bounti quarterly revenues of $10.2M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$8.8M is higher than Local Bounti's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Local Bounti's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.00x versus 0.53x for Local Bounti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pioneer Green Farms has a net margin of -528.93% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -3784581.4%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -225.34% beat Pioneer Green Farms's return on equity of --.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 877559.47%. On the other hand Pioneer Green Farms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Pioneer Green Farms, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Pioneer Green Farms.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pioneer Green Farms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pioneer Green Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pioneer Green Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are larger than Pioneer Green Farms quarterly revenues of $40. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Pioneer Green Farms's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pioneer Green Farms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.00x versus 238.20x for Pioneer Green Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smithfield Foods Inc. has a net margin of -528.93% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of --. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -225.34% beat Smithfield Foods Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 877559.47%. On the other hand Smithfield Foods Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Smithfield Foods Inc., analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Smithfield Foods Inc..

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smithfield Foods Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smithfield Foods Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smithfield Foods Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are larger than Smithfield Foods Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$8.8M is higher than Smithfield Foods Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smithfield Foods Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.00x versus -- for Smithfield Foods Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

22nd Century Group has a net margin of -528.93% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -247.47%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -225.34% beat 22nd Century Group's return on equity of -832.63%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 877559.47%. On the other hand 22nd Century Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1199901.2%. Given that 22nd Century Group has higher upside potential than Greenlane Holdings, analysts believe 22nd Century Group is more attractive than Greenlane Holdings.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 22nd Century Group has a beta of 1.952, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.208%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 22nd Century Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 22nd Century Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.7M, which are smaller than 22nd Century Group quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$8.8M is lower than 22nd Century Group's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 22nd Century Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.00x versus 0.02x for 22nd Century Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.